The only way that the tens of tons of uranium and plutonium shown by US EPA air samples could occur was if the explosion came from within the reactor vessel, and/or spent fuel pool. So clearly the explosion was a nuclear type of explosion from within. Nuclear promoters have long stated that nuclear plants can't blow up in a nuclear explosion. We know this to be a lie. In fact Chicago's own Argonne National Lab has video from back in the day when it was "cool" to perform open air tests to blow up reactors to prove the nuclear chain reaction can blow up the reactors. The special type of Nuclear Explosion is called a "prompt moderated criticality".
A blast from a "hydrogen explosion" would come from a wide area where hydrogen would be, Hydrogen is the lightest element, so it would float up and fill the reactor building from the top down. If it truly was a hydrogen explosion, and it wasn't, then the blast would come from the top down. The fuels would be compressed into their deep containments, not launched thousands of feet into the air as did occur.
I am going to stop calling these things reactor vessels, and instead call them "Radiation Cannons"
Here is the Argonne National Lab proof of concept Even Arnie Gundersen chimed in to clarify the nature of the Prompt Criticality
This Prompt criticality doubles in power every millionth of a second and causes incredibly rapid power increase that is the destructive nature of a bomb. The second type of prompt criticality is called a prompt MODERATED criticality, which is what I believed happened at Fukushima.
Here is his whole email on the subject
Now we do know that tens of tons (at least) were launched into the air and effectively aerosolized by the Radiation Canon (aka reactor vessel). Simply using the density of the uranium and plutonium in the air as presented by EPA air sampling tests that are data mined to reveal their dirty little secrets. All that data and the simple calculations to calculate mass using known density and area/volume of dispersion are HERE-
Read the link above, its important. It is the smoking gun. Here is a excerpt table from the calcs in the link above, from EPA data
One thing to note, the nuclear promoters know that plutonium is a dirty word, and many laymen know how dangerous plutonium is. In the table above, EPA states ND supposedly for "None Detected" but in reality, that is a lie as the real story was "not tested". 3 facts: in reactors, as uranium burns, it turns into some percentage of plutonium. Also any "spent fuel" will therefore also contain plutonium. And finally in Reactor, aka Radiation Canon 3, they were using MOX fuel which is a uranium with highly concentrated Plutonium.
The nuclear promoters try to lie to cover up their dirty little secrets, to protect "their precious".
Bottom line....if there is uranium in the air, there is plutonium in the air.
Below you find 3 separate sources proving the Plutonium detected in USA and even as far as Lithuania.
Plutonium Admission by EPA
Just today, ENENEWS broke an article showing plutonium in New Mexico with the Fukushima "signature"
And just for good measure, here is the video of Radiation Canon 3 exploding. Note the huge chunk of steel/concrete that was launched upward, and the apex, it falls off to the left.
Wouldn't it be better to remove the Radiation Cannons from your Backyard? Remove them all from the HOME PLANET.
Per blogger "AGreenRoad"----http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/fukushima-plutonium-detected-in.html
Now, why do you think that they are claiming nothing happened at Fukushima, and nothing harmful came out? They cannot afford to let you know the horrible truth of what happened.
Toxicity of both Uranium and Plutonium are functions of their radioactivity AND even more importantly, they are highly toxic heavy metals. Their One-Two punch is a killer.
A 1996 testing of 144 Beagles given inhaled Plutonium killed 141 of the dogs within 1.5 to 5.4 years. Bone tumors killed 93, Lung tumors killed 46, and liver tumors killed 2 (although liver tumors were found in 20 dogs, just that the Bone and Lung killed quicker).
Maybe we ought to stop putting this stuff into Radiation Cannons?
Engineering support for the Energy Required to create the Explosive Effect at Reactor 3 (from a reader)
Yes it was a nuclear explosion. We did the math here on March 31, 2011 and showed in the Fukushima Mega-thread that a nuclear detonation occurred.
How much energy is required to raise both the refueling crane and reactor vessel cover to a height of 450 feet?
It would require 10,968,750 horse power (HP); by assuming the height of the hydrogen vent tower to be 150 feet, the reactor containment vessel top appears to have gone two and one-half times higher or 450 feet; The top of the reactor vessel weighs 2000 tons. It requires 12.1875 HP to raise one ton in one second.
So we needed 10,968,750 HP to raise 2000 tons 450 feet in one second.
1 HP = 0.000641615568281 tons of TNT or we have 7037.7 tons of TNT.
7 kilotons of TNT just to lift the top of the containment vessel off
You have further force required to raise the refueling crane to that same 450 feet of height.
It was instantly obvious to any observer with a rudimentary knowledge of Physics that this was an explosion possessing force that could in no way be the result of a steam explosion.