Here is the Excel File Itself
Download it from Box which is a great free service, I recommend them.
https://app.box.com/s/wza4c690phtxq7cfutzt1880 to 1913 Global Temperature Data
Maybe even do some more advanced number crunching, or correlate them to nuke bomb testing and sunspots. Have at it! For now if you need the file, email me, and I will send it to you.
Bottom line, Global Warming has certainly occurred since 1880, but temperatures go in cycles, and "we" (meaning humans including scientists) do not understand them. There is a lot of complex stuff that affects weather, and yours truly strongly believes that sunspots and other sun magnetic and electric effects and as also related to cosmic ray blocking are WAY more important than CO2 from fossil fuel burning. Most of the Egg Head scientists don't even understand solar spots and are crappy at predicting cycles, and befuddled when there academia programmed minds can't operate to understand a process when it conflicts with their "training".
Bottom line---there has been NO GLOBAL WARMING over the past 17 years. Isn't that an "inconvenient truth" for those who wish to transfer wealth via Cap and Trade type acts. Also pretty inconvenient for those who wish to promote a dying nuclear energy field by stating that it can help reduce global warming.
Fact, we are seeing some more extreme weather months in the last 17 years, BUT the standard deviation is actually going down, see the chart. What does it mean?
Simple. Those in the boomer and post boomer generations have lived through a period of incredible weather stability. In the far known and measured past, weather has been more extreme. Just that fact alone helps the huge economic expansion of post WW2. We had it good. Now we are getting a few extreme spikes. It will be hotter and colder, dryer and wetter going forward. But global temperature has stalled out, and a reversal is likely.
Another big thing that is barely on most peoples radar is the earths magnetic pole shift, I can't deal with that one today, but realize it could be a massive effect on earth weather.
Check out the charts and drop a comment.
http://agwunveiled.blogspot.ca/2013/12/calculated-meanglobal-temperatures-1610.html
And a frequent commenter here, Dud added in
No chart for sunspot activity?
Rectified, if you like --> http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg
Quote: "One of the possible explanations for a link between sunspots and weather is via cosmic rays. It is accepted that cosmic rays play a part in cloud formation by encouraging the nucleation of water droplets. It is also accepted that there is a negative correlation between sunspots and cosmic rays. Figure 5 demonstrates this link."
http://www.climatedata.info/Forcing/Forcing/sunspots.html
And amazingly, on Aug 1, 2014 when I published my proof that Global Warming is a scam, Suspicious Observers had a short comment on their daily video, and the statement that "there has been no warming for 17 years" and a link to a long video that goes deep into Global Warming scam. I haven't watched it yet, but here it is.
Sadly I came to the same findings, and it does seem that the catastrophic man-made global warming theory has been pushed mostly by people aligned with the nuclear expansion agenda. And some very well-meaning environmentalistas (with not the best scientific interpretation skills, imo) fell for the propaganda… .
Using NOAA Annual averages I settled on a conservative "at least 12 years of no global warming", with signs (esp. related to solar activity) pointing to cooling ahead:
https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/warmest-may-global-cooling-climate-change/
One of the most pronounced examples of using the CO2-scare to push nuclear has been George Monbiot, who stepped up the nuke propaganda machine before the data was even in, with, "Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power" (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima But most "warmistas" in key positions of political influence have one thing in common (Al Gore, Obama, James Hansen, Bill McKibben, etc.), they're also supporting the nuke agenda…
Thanks Stock--Nice work!! You clearly put a lot of time and effort into finding, compiling, entering, displaying and analyzing the data--with very good results.
ReplyDeleteYou conclusion is interesting and merits a closer look for me as this runs counter to my long-held assumptions/understanding about global warming. I'll need to come back to it later when I have more time.
BTW--excellent graphs!
Thanks again, Stock. This is really great stuff! :-)
All the best,
Sparky
Sparky, ENE appears to be down hard. Suspicious timing with the EPA comment period Aug 3 which is a Sunday.
DeleteAny ideas?
Hi Stock, Strange--I posted a reply a few minutes ago and it disappeared. Try again:
DeleteSorry for my delayed response. Yes, The ENE blackout was VERY disturbing. Harlan and I have worked out arrangements for the 'Newser "workgroup" communications, but I think we'll need a bigger "room" as a back-up (if possible) in case ENE goes down long term.
Thankfully, ENE is now up and running, with some apparent minor site repairs. Let's hope it lasts.
I doubt, however, that ENE as a news aggregator and unique on-line community could be duplicated or replaced. I hope ENE Admin has fortified the site against these ever-evolving attacks.
I know Nukepro has had it's share of attacks as well. Constant vigilance is necessary, which can be very time-consuming and costly. I'm preaching to the choir, I know....)
Sparky out. :-)
Ah, now i see the gap in posts.
DeleteThat was from 8:30 PM EDT, Aug 01 to 7:32 PM EDT, Aug 02.
The first post after the blackout was ironically newsblackoutUSA's post.
It sure is nice to see admin post again. http://enenews.com/forum-topic-discussion-thread-nuclear-issues-mar-25-2014-present/comment-page-60#comment-557990
Looking forward to seeing if my theory concerning No-IP was correct (or not). Moreso looking forward to admin posting more.
Long live ENEnews!
"Nukepro got your back with real information, not the disinformation of the MSM"
ReplyDeleteYeah! Thanks Nukepro!!
Sparky
"They" own the power supply, the major water supply chain, the food chain. We pay them to live. The Anthropomorphic global warming scam was to devise a method of charging us for the air we breathe.
ReplyDeleteFull spectrum.
They also own the internet and built it for their own, consciousness control, purposes.
Thanks for the work Nuke Pro
Love xxx
Aloha, no simple quick solutions here, however, unless we can win the battle against man made radiation, the other battles are trivial.
DeleteYou are too modest, as you are actively working towards solutions via alternative energy. Does being "anti"-nuke not imply "instead" of "nukular" technology? However; it is as you say "no simple quick solutions".
DeleteBreak free of the chains that hold us in slavery &/or servitude.
Vote with your dollars, veto with your feet by not patronizing "their" services (where reasonably possible).
Neo-Patriotism means being loyal to fellow countrymen (& women), not the Incorporated "State" (should it not be a Partnership instead?).
Am always wary of Nationalism and it's many feces, er ahem, faces.
Household alternate energy production should be considered a vital part of Retirement planning, in my humble opine.
An equation, with only two drivers as independent variables, explains measured average global temperatures since before 1900 with 95% correlation, calculates credible values back to 1610, and predicts to 2037. CO2 change is not one of the drivers.
ReplyDeleteSearch AGW unveiled for the method, equation, data sources, history (hind cast to 1610) and predictions (to 2037).
Nice work, Mr. Pangburn (by the way)!
DeleteI wish somebody had data on Oxygen and Noble gases in Sea-level atmosphere composition from this side of the new millennia.
Id like to pass the excel data through a neural network I developed for pattern recognition. If you are interested then you know how to get a hold of me at my work email. I think that would make us even for the nuclear air cleaning handbook. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAdvise the basic strategy of said neural network, and pattern recognition strategies. Send me your email I don't have time to reivew the files, very busy now.
DeleteProviding the secrets of the lie of global warming would not make us "equal" for Atoms providing a government spec and standards paper....sorry, thats a big no go.
Hi stock, I saw you posted this on enenews this morning but could only glance through... I just read the whole thing. This is fascinating. Sharing this and circulating. Thanks always.
ReplyDeleteRoger that, please circulate. 1M people can read some BS either way on global warming, but 10,000 who care and read this and take action could be the tipping point
DeleteTIPP it good!
No chart for sunspot activity?
ReplyDeleteRectified, if you like --> http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg
Quote: "One of the possible explanations for a link between sunspots and weather is via cosmic rays. It is accepted that cosmic rays play a part in cloud formation by encouraging the nucleation of water droplets. It is also accepted that there is a negative correlation between sunspots and cosmic rays. Figure 5 demonstrates this link."
http://www.climatedata.info/Forcing/Forcing/sunspots.html
More extreme weather events to proceed with a trend towards cooling. Check.
ReplyDeleteWill it be like envisioned in "The Coming Global SuperStorm" by Art Bell and Whitley Strieber and/or "The Day After Tomorrow"? I don't know, though i hope not. Those Mammoths with food in their mouths & bellies is compelling evidence. What is it evidence of though???
A repost from: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/03/cancer-does-not-just-cause-cancer-it-is.html?showComment=1405754568780#c223107105179085618
ReplyDelete"Quote: "In a study published in July 2014, a team of scientists led by a researcher from the Desert Research Institute announced they had a discovered a new type of soot particle produced by wildfires. The particles, called “superaggregates,” are on average ten times longer and have a more compact shape than conventional soot particles from vehicles and cook stoves. Their distinctive shape means they likely have a more potent warming effect on the climate than other types of soot.
“We found that superaggregates contribute up to 90-percent more warming than spherical sub-micrometer soot particles, which current climate models use,” said the study’s lead author, Rajan Chakrabarty. “These preliminary findings warrant further research to quantify the significant impact these particles may have on climate, human health, and air pollution around the world.”"
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=84002 "
NorthWest Territories has seen an abundance of thick smoke around Great Slave Lake. It is haltingly awesome how much territory it has covered.
Monday (Aug 4, 2014, 8:00 PDT), it is PREDICTED that there will be a huge "front" of thick smoke (~25% (Wild Ass Guess) being >300micrograms/m3), like a weather front, from Great Bear Lake to Lake Winnipeg for most of the afternoon.
via: http://www.bcairquality.ca/bluesky/west/index.html
Previously, i witnessed such thick plumes move North/Easterly from around Great Slave Lake.
Hoping not a lot is accumulating on Greenland ice.
After all, most of it will likely fall out somewhere.
Are we witnessing another pathway towards ocean acidification ("nukular" stupidity in JA (& elsewhere) being a multiplicative pathway, if i have that correct).
OT Query (no answer required): Was the "black substance" an example of another type of superaggregate? :/
DeleteYou have made a case for damage due to radiation contamination, but you still have not made a case that global warming does not exist. There are a variety of converging forces that are contributing to the degradation of the earth. Currently the residents of Toledo, Ohio cannot drink their water due to algae bloom caused by agricultural / chemical runoff.
ReplyDeleteBy denying global warming, and by casting most scientists as "Eggheads" you are reducing your credibility and isolating yourself.
I think that many of the solutions you offer share common ground with those offered by people concerned with global warming. If people of opposing points of view would realize that they actually share common ground instead of arguing about the points upon which they disagree, much progress could be made in combatting the damage to the earth and the environment.
HIlarious, you state that Nukepro has not made a case that global warming does not exist. Wow, do you even bother to review the top chart? A seventh grader could tell you that we are not warming for the last 17 years.
DeleteMore radical weather and a cooling trend are what we are faced with.
The sun is the main driver here.
Stock - The top graph shows a simple step up to where we are, and yeah, as we load the atmosphere, the earth can absorb so much until we exceed it ability then we go up again, that's what the graph tells me. Simply because we are at the highest 'step' on the graph and we haven't went up for a few years does not mean it's no happening. Sorry.
DeleteMemo to Jimmy Conca:
ReplyDeleteIf you like your radiation care plan, you can keep it! :P
LOL, I did ask Conca what his regimen was for increased radiation intake to promote whoremesis.....
Deletehis answer "of course I don't try to take more radiation"
heretic! LOL
Quote of jsam: "The earth is losing a trillion tons of ice per year:
ReplyDelete- 159 Gt Antarctic land ice, McMillan el al, GRL (2014)
+ 26 Gt Antarctic sea ice, Holland et al, J Climate (2014)
- 261 Gt Arctic sea ice, PIOMAS
- 378 Gt Greenland, Enderlin et al, GRL (2014)
- 259 Gt other land based glaciers, Gardner et al. Science (2013)
- 1,031 Gt, total
Deniers can find the 2% growth and miss the 98% shrinkage."
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/10/09/we_have_more_to_learn_says_scientist_antarctic_sea_ice_at_all_time_record/#c_2324060
I don't know if this is true. Is this true?
Quote: "Burned and blasted craters, along with piles of scorched dust cover almost an entire hemisphere of Mars. Gigantic trenches across its scarred face could indicate that lightning thousands or millions of times more energetic than we know today devastated Mars."
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2011/10/12/nuclear-war-god/
Haven't read this yet, but it has stimulated an induced current of interest in my mind.
"The Essential Guide to the Electric Universe (EG2EU)"
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2011/08/18/10609/
This goes hand in hand, if i have that correctly. :)
http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/java/handrules/
Is the Helix Nebula (picture linked below) a similar system to the one pictured on the top of the Guide to the Electric Universe, though from a different angle?
Deletehttp://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141012.html
The question i pose, if & when you have time for it is "are air &/or water masses becoming more polarized?"
ReplyDelete(four hurricanes/cyclones/typhoons yesterday, i had it wrong previously - along with the cyclone which was NOT parked off of India)
Wind looking more "loopy", especially around DC, if i have that correct.
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/500hPa/orthographic=-71.64,79.91,283
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-71.64,79.91,283
Domo arigato. Sakeido Hantai!
DeleteAlso, shrinking heliosphere due to weakening solar magnetism (?) and weakening Earth magnetosphere allow more cosmic radiation to create clouds, iirc. What that does to Kr or Xe (etc) in lower atmosphere (along with lightning, perhaps), i can only imagine.
The latest scam is the claim made this week that the cold is caused by the ocean soaking up the sun's heat. This is silly beyond words. These same people claimed we would see more el Nino events.
DeleteInstead, la Nina has sat in the Pacific for several years now with no sign of departing. They also predicted more and more hurricanes. Zero this year so far! Utterly devastated the official predictions of at least 12.
Where are these hurricanes? What prevents them? Hurricanes grow in warm water so why isn't the water off of Africa and in the Caribbean warm enough? While supposedly soaking up all that sun with no sun spots?
So, they claim now that global warming will NOT have hurricanes and big storms! And I suppose, will cause early freezes, too. As well as more blizzards and bigger glaciers. This isn't science, this is childish.
The true nature of science is to be able to ACCURATELY PREDICT THE FUTURE. If the models don't match reality, they, not reality, must fall. I see virtually no accuracy in global warming model predictions so long as they leave out the sun spot element. And I hope they figure this out before they are eaten by polar bears roaming London and Virginia."
http://climatechange90.blogspot.com/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html?showComment=1378528642335#c210666726430881181
Quote of " Anonymous Coward": "The discovery this week of axions (ie dark matter) from the stellar core?
ReplyDeleteNew particle, barely interacts with matter but more so than neutrinos, decays by emitting photons." [purportedly x-rays] "
Could be responsible for the radioactive seasonal decay anomaly and possibly contribute to noise in superconductors."
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2014/10/18/nasa_spies_solar_heat_bombs_mini_tornadoes_and_nanoflares_on_sun/
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/iris-helps-explain-heating-of-solar-atmosphere/
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml
Quote: "Possible 2014 detection
Axions may have been detected through irregularities in X-ray emission due to interaction of the Earth's magnetic field with radiation streaming from the Sun. Studying 15 years of detection data produced by the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton observatory, a research group at Leicester University noticed a seasonal variation for which no conventional explanation could be found. One potential explanation for the variation, described as "plausible" by the senior author of the paper that reported the team's findings, was X-rays produced by interaction of Axions produced at the Sun's core with the Earth's magnetic field.[26]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion
Quote: "With this disclaimer, they look at the amount of X-rays with energies between 0.2 and 10keV and notice that the flux has a rather clear seasonal dependence. The significance of these effects is claimed to be 4, 5, and 11 sigma (!!!)"
http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/10/an-overlooked-paper-discovering-axions.html
Quote: "The reality is that there's been no positive trend in the global mean temperature for 18 years "
http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/antarctica-is-climate-denier-too.html
Quote: "Oh, the CO2 concentration is so high! It's a signal from the heaven, a shot from the Aurora telling us to start another world revolution because our previous one, that of 1917, has already faded away and it wasn't enough for us, anyway. The number is so round, and so on. Of course, nothing new happens when the CO2 level reaches 400 ppm – it's just another number that only looks special because of an arbitrary decadic numeral system we happen to use today. The Earth has seen concentrations around 6,000 ppm as well and 4,000 ppm would be just fine for all life forms we know today. By far the closest worrisome CO2 concentration is 150 ppm in which most existing plant species stop growing (ice ages have only forced them to easily withstand 180 ppm or so)."
http://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/one-half-of-co2-doubling-achieved.html
That would be MBP, the anarchist & future chicken-hawk, leading the "revolutionary" charge, i'd wager.
Quote: "The empirical data make it clear that there can't be a predictable yet high global warming. Either the CO2-induced warming is predictable, in which case the negligible increase before 2014 must be a good estimate; or the CO2-induced warming is high in which case one needs other, equally large factors that were canceling it, and the future is unpredictable because of these factors!"
ReplyDeletehttp://motls.blogspot.ca/2014/09/one-half-of-co2-doubling-achieved.html
Quote: "April 16, 2014: Earth's poles are separated by four oceans, six continents and more than 12,000 nautical miles.
ReplyDeleteTurns out, that's not so far apart.
New data from NASA's AIM spacecraft have revealed "teleconnections" in Earth's atmosphere that stretch all the way from the North Pole to the South Pole and back again, linking weather and climate more closely than simple geography would suggest. "
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/16apr_teleconnections/
" "We picked Indianapolis as an example, because I have family living there," says Randall, "but the same was true of many northern cities: cold air temperatures on the ground were correlated with NLC frequencies high above Antarctica two weeks later," she says.
The two week delay is, apparently, how much time it takes for the teleconnection signal to propagate through three layers of atmosphere (the troposphere, stratosphere and mesosphere), and from pole to pole."
Does the former help explain some strange radiation readings in Australia &/or New Zealand in relation to Fukushima Daiichi ongoing "nukular" disaster?
Delete... also see: http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/what-happened-at-fukushima-in-fall-of.html?showComment=1414639948238#c5246119315758867393
DeleteIn regards to calculations and formulae by Dan Pangburn @ http://climatechange90.blogspot.ca/2013/05/natural-climate-change-has-been.html
ReplyDeleteOne sentence from the following "article" caught my eye, regarding anticipated greater cosmic ray penetration into the inner Sol system in years to come.
I hope it can serve to refine predictions.
Quote: "The time to 3 per cent REID is estimated to be ~20 per cent lower in the coming cycle 24–25 minimum."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/22/the_sun_has_changed_in_a_way_weve_never_seen_mars_trips_may_be_off/
Would that be somewhere in between "assuming sunspots like from 1925 to 1941 or for the case of no sunspots"?
Note how they say "nukular" is the only thing that could supposedly save us.
The Rosetta satellite proves otherwise with it's new panels that harvest light at a distance where only 4% the intensity of Earth-bound sunlight is available!
Quote: ""The solar cells in Rosetta's solar panels are based on a completely new technology, so-called Low-intensity Low Temperature Cells. Thanks to them, Rosetta is the first space mission to journey beyond the main asteroid belt relying solely on solar cells for power generation.
"Previous deep-space missions used nuclear RTGs, radioisotope thermal generators. The new solar cells allow Rosetta to operate over 800 million kilometres from the Sun, where levels of sunlight are only 4% those on Earth. The technology will be available for future deep-space, such as ESA's upcoming Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer.""
http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/2503653/rosetta_shows_we_can_keep_space_plutoniumfree.html (also available on Enformable site)
There is also has some brief info on SNAP-9A/Cosmos-954 238Pu incidents. An article from another site gives me a new lie for your list. :)
dud(e) don't hold back on the lies, lay them out, lol
DeleteSo, shooting from the hip is the butt of your argument? Where's the beef?
DeleteYou appear all about style, yet argue with no substance.
Must they be lying, because stone-cold deniallist Steve "Anonymous" said so?
Your illogical argument has similar effect as one hand clapping.
Quote (from 2014/09): "For the first time in thousands of years, warm water is flowing into the Arctic Ocean."
ReplyDelete... "There are methane hydrate concentrations in all of these areas up to 1,500 feet deep for miles and miles. There are fractures here that give mantel methane a route to the surface that have been safely sealed by ice. The hydrates and seals are thawing."
... "On the Greenland side, warm water is flowing into the Arctic from the Labrador, Greenland and Norway seas. The international SWERUSs-C3 expedition on the icebreaker Oden is recording 'mega flares' of methane."
http://arctic-news.blogspot.ca/2014/09/warm-water-flowing-into-arctic-ocean.html
Quote: "What was once Category 5 Super Typhoon Nuri bombed into one of the strongest extratropical storms ever observed in the Pacific Ocean, reaching 924 mb at 06 UTC Saturday morning" [Nov 8] " --a pressure rarely achieved by an extratropical storm. The only two Pacific storms I am aware of that compare are the October 25 - 26, 1977 storm near Dutch Harbor, Alaska that set Alaska's all-time low pressure record (925 mb), and a storm from December 24, 1975 that hit 926 mb near 49°N 158°W."
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2855
It was odd to see a "Tropical Storm" on RSOE amidst the Aleutian Isles.
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=event_desc&edis_id=ST-20141107-45921-USA
Quote: "In my research, I came across the idea that when the Sun is at the apex of its bobbing, towards galactic north, it’s about 100 light years above the galactic plane. That’s far enough up that the magnetic fields of the galaxy are weaker, and it’s these fields that protect the Sun (and the planets, meaning us) from intergalactic cosmic rays, subatomic particles that zip around space between galaxies. When the Sun is up high, these cosmic rays can strike us, and we have to endure this particulate rain for millions of years. The radiation can do bad things, like damage the ozone layer or induce genetic mutations."
...
"A new result has just been announced that says that when the Sun is in the thick of the Milky Way’s plane, tides from the galaxy can induce comets from the outer solar system to plunge down toward the Sun, meaning many will hit the Earth and potentially cause mass extinctions."
...
"According to the new study, this happens every 35 – 40 million years,"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/06/bobbing-for-extinctions/
If that be true, then those induced comets events should precede and follow that 64 million year period by about 16 million years.
In addition, i don't understand why there is no affect noted (AFAIK) when the Sol system approaches it's most southern galactic apex.
"Strange days indeed" - Julian Lennon