Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Radiation does not "JUST" cause cancer, it is a broad spectrum poison

One of the classic lies of nuke, it that radiation "only" causes cancer. In reality it causes many diseases directly, and works with other weaknesses to create diseases. It is "synergistic" one could say, in an evil way.

 From Mack at ENENEWS--

And it’s not just cancers of the breast, thyroid, liver, pancreas, colon, brain, lung, testes, ovaries, skin, esophagus, blood, etc. that can be caused by manmade nuclear radiation.

It’s also:
  1. Heart disease . 
  2. Respiratory Problems
  3. Stroke
  4. Pneumonia
  5. Increased susceptibility to viruses, bacteria, etc.
  6. Diabetes
  7. Circulatory problems
  8. Blood disorders, i.e., neutropenia, leukemia
  9. Thyroid problems
  10. Skin problems
  11. Stomach problems
  12. Birth defects
  13. Stillborn
  14. Miscarriages
  15. Cataracts
  16. Rashes
  17. Fatigue, dizziness
  18. Hearing loss
  19. Memory loss
  20. Cognitive problems
  21. Joint/Cartilage problems
  22. And more… 
If you listen to the pronukers, however, you may immediately develop a banana phobia, which may be cured by watching the following humorous video first seen on AGreenRoad blog.


6 comments:

  1. d'oh, be aware i have been quoting Pacific Daylight Time above. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IDK if there be a relationship between smoke & readings, especially based only upon momentary readings via two stations that may or not be historically average.

    Bighting my tongue somewhat for now, to ensure am not generating "harmful" rumor.

    Got it to "the geek", whom may or may not already have been tracking this. :)

    August appears to be shaping up to be hot, damn hot.

    TTFN.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sidebar, your honor.

    Quote: "In a study published in July 2014, a team of scientists led by a researcher from the Desert Research Institute announced they had a discovered a new type of soot particle produced by wildfires. The particles, called “superaggregates,” are on average ten times longer and have a more compact shape than conventional soot particles from vehicles and cook stoves. Their distinctive shape means they likely have a more potent warming effect on the climate than other types of soot.

    “We found that superaggregates contribute up to 90-percent more warming than spherical sub-micrometer soot particles, which current climate models use,” said the study’s lead author, Rajan Chakrabarty. “These preliminary findings warrant further research to quantify the significant impact these particles may have on climate, human health, and air pollution around the world.”"

    http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=84002

    Not going for climate change, just looking at potential modification to weather during wildfire season.

    Over to you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Seattle area and NorthWest Washington are predicted to receive at least some smoke tomorrow. It should be much thicker in NW WA compared to Seattle though.

    Thank you, stock.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My warning was a botch job.
    We received no smoke, thankfully.

    However; since i was wrong, i must modify what i do.

    Am content to simply pass along wildfire smoke information to educate, along with links to smoke prediction maps. However; so far am missing smoke predictions for other areas than simply the land of Candu.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Update to "I wonder if forecast & Terra/MODIS data agree."

    It certainly didn't this weekend.
    Winds shifted to the East, which might not have been surprising considering the weakness in onland surface air currents at the time. It was very thankfully a non-event, at least here in the Fraser Valley.

    There was some smoky thunderhead (cumulonimbus) cloud Friday night.

    *** I've drifted too far off-topic here, so deleted rest of comment. Apologies to admin & readership. Wildfire smoke & the chemically toxic, mutogenic, tetrogenic & especially carcinogenic properties of radiologicals has a loose link. I didn't really know where to discuss this at first, so i'll stop for now.

    ReplyDelete