The red zone is 1/1000 times less than the original dispersion in Japan. That doesn't sound all that great considering they just caught a fish with 254,000 Bq per kG at the Fukushima harbor. Anything above 100 Bq/kG is extremely bad. Eating 1kG of this fish is like a total of 2 years of total radiation exposure, and ITS INTERNAL!
Pages
- Home
- Troll Jousting
- Radiation Preparation Resources
- Radiation Decorporation Resources
- Carrington Event and Astronomy
- Largest Lies of Nuke
- Nuke Accidents Civilian and Military 99 since 195...
- Videos, Moderated Prompt Criticality, real test by...
- Gundersen Email and Theories
- Conversions and Safety Limits
- Links Including Rad Maps
- Manifesto - Action Plan
- List of Reactors
- Pictures - High Quality
- Manifesto - Why Shut Them Down
- Renewable and Energy Efficiency
- Prepper/Survival Resources
- Uranium Aerosolized Into Atmosphere
- Chernobyl, How Real Men Fight a Nuke Diasaster
- Hormesis Is a Lie, Radiation that does not kill yo...
- Baseline is Just One Of The Lies
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Radiation Spread in the Pacific, a good model
This model does self admit that they are completely ignoring the effects of bio accumulation, which would make things much worse. Looks like Hawaii is already seeing the ocean impact.
The red zone is 1/1000 times less than the original dispersion in Japan. That doesn't sound all that great considering they just caught a fish with 254,000 Bq per kG at the Fukushima harbor. Anything above 100 Bq/kG is extremely bad. Eating 1kG of this fish is like a total of 2 years of total radiation exposure, and ITS INTERNAL!
http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/7/3/034004/article
The red zone is 1/1000 times less than the original dispersion in Japan. That doesn't sound all that great considering they just caught a fish with 254,000 Bq per kG at the Fukushima harbor. Anything above 100 Bq/kG is extremely bad. Eating 1kG of this fish is like a total of 2 years of total radiation exposure, and ITS INTERNAL!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Used to live to be in the ocean, now not as exciting.
ReplyDeleteThis will impact the state of California's tourism business and the surf industry . I've been surfing since age 4 or since 1958 an live to surf . This will impact almost everyone I know .
ReplyDeleteThe fact is there are no safe dose's of radiation period and anyone who says that its only small amounts is ignorant to the real facts.