I built this tool to help me wrap my head around what I needed to do to produce all the food needed for my family and 2 dogs.
Fortunately, the dogs love Zuchinni of which I had 10 plants.
This spreadsheet provide information on number of plants needed, customizable for number of people, and a "like" factor based on whether you want more of a vegetable or less.
It also gives you plant spacing data, and plant height so you can plan your layout (tall stuff goes to north side)
And it calculates the total square footage needed, including room for walkways and tools and such.
No wonder the neighbors call me "Super Garden Guy" LOL
Enjoy, I will maybe improve this spreadsheet in spring. Bottom line...it worked, besides buying occasional protein (chicken, milk, beer) this garden did achieve the goal of producing all our food.
I think I saw some TSA drones over the garden (Tomato Surveillance Agency)
How much to plant for a year of food
Planting timeframes et al
stock out
Pages
- Home
- Troll Jousting
- Radiation Preparation Resources
- Radiation Decorporation Resources
- Carrington Event and Astronomy
- Largest Lies of Nuke
- Nuke Accidents Civilian and Military 99 since 195...
- Videos, Moderated Prompt Criticality, real test by...
- Gundersen Email and Theories
- Conversions and Safety Limits
- Links Including Rad Maps
- Manifesto - Action Plan
- List of Reactors
- Pictures - High Quality
- Manifesto - Why Shut Them Down
- Renewable and Energy Efficiency
- Prepper/Survival Resources
- Uranium Aerosolized Into Atmosphere
- Chernobyl, How Real Men Fight a Nuke Diasaster
- Hormesis Is a Lie, Radiation that does not kill yo...
- Baseline is Just One Of The Lies
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Global Warming Spreadsheet Data, 1880 to 2013
This is the real earth temperature data
It shows no warming for 17 years running
It has my charts Embedded in there
Global Temp Data 1880 to 2013
It shows no warming for 17 years running
It has my charts Embedded in there
Global Temp Data 1880 to 2013
Total future WIPP Inventory, Resource Spreadsheet
This is what is now siting around above ground in fairly insecure locations, probably with drones flying over them.
This is what they were still intending to put into WIPP before the Plutonium Explosion underground.
this is the low level stuff. It does not include the Conca shill desires to stash even the high level and reactor waste into the WIPP.
The low level stuff has enough radiation in it to bring every living thing on the planet up a level of 70 Bq/kG
30 Bq/kG is pretty deadly, and 100 Bq/kG is plain illegal to use as food.
Future WIPP Inventory
Here is what it looks like, sources are cited within the spreadsheet
This is what they were still intending to put into WIPP before the Plutonium Explosion underground.
this is the low level stuff. It does not include the Conca shill desires to stash even the high level and reactor waste into the WIPP.
The low level stuff has enough radiation in it to bring every living thing on the planet up a level of 70 Bq/kG
30 Bq/kG is pretty deadly, and 100 Bq/kG is plain illegal to use as food.
Future WIPP Inventory
Here is what it looks like, sources are cited within the spreadsheet
Total Spent Fuel Inventory at Fukushima
This spreadsheet is "light" by the uranium and the noble gases (Xenon)
It also is missing the in use fuel at R1, R2, R3
Any geeks out there watching the snow fall and can download the Excel, and add in the missing quantities would be greatly appreciated.
Total Spent Fuel Radiation Inventory at Fukushima
here are some Xenon Resources to get started
majia
Can you please fix the link for the reference for Steven Biegalski.
The source I have on file
J. McIntyre, S. Biegalski, T. Bowyer, M. Copper, P. Eslinger, J. Hayes, D. Haas, H. Miley, J. Rishel, V. Woods (2011) ‘US Particulate and Xenon Measurements Made Following the Fukushima Reactor Accident’, http://www.batan.go.id/inge2011/file/day1/1650_mcintyre.pdf
MY SUMMARY: In June of 2012, researchers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Texas published for public review a power point presentation titled ‘US Particulate and Xenon Measurements Made Following the Fukushima Reactor Accident’ by. The researchers had used a SAUNA-II xenon measurement system in March and April of 2011 to measure noble gasses from Fukushima reaching the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The system measured Xenon-133 at 450,000 times background. The levels persisted for weeks. Xenon-133 emits beta particles (high intensity electrons) and gamma rays as it decays. Inhalation of Xenon poses a danger to human health.
dosdos The xenon release was primarily from the unit #3 detonation, and it blanketed the entire US and Canada.
It also is missing the in use fuel at R1, R2, R3
Any geeks out there watching the snow fall and can download the Excel, and add in the missing quantities would be greatly appreciated.
Total Spent Fuel Radiation Inventory at Fukushima
here are some Xenon Resources to get started
majia
November 16, 2014 at 1:30 pm
Enenews Admin:Can you please fix the link for the reference for Steven Biegalski.
The source I have on file
J. McIntyre, S. Biegalski, T. Bowyer, M. Copper, P. Eslinger, J. Hayes, D. Haas, H. Miley, J. Rishel, V. Woods (2011) ‘US Particulate and Xenon Measurements Made Following the Fukushima Reactor Accident’, http://www.batan.go.id/inge2011/file/day1/1650_mcintyre.pdf
MY SUMMARY: In June of 2012, researchers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Texas published for public review a power point presentation titled ‘US Particulate and Xenon Measurements Made Following the Fukushima Reactor Accident’ by. The researchers had used a SAUNA-II xenon measurement system in March and April of 2011 to measure noble gasses from Fukushima reaching the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The system measured Xenon-133 at 450,000 times background. The levels persisted for weeks. Xenon-133 emits beta particles (high intensity electrons) and gamma rays as it decays. Inhalation of Xenon poses a danger to human health.
Report comment
Resource Spreadsheet: Strontium Biological Half Life
I got a new BOX account, which allows you to download some of my actual spreadsheets.
TERMS OF USE
Feel free to use these spreadsheets, they are authorized for public use and modification for any anti-nuclear purpose, and only that. It is required that a complete hyperlink to Nukepro shall be included in any use of the spreadsheets.
One of the lies the nukers use is the half life, or the biological half life. Such as cesium leaves the body at the rate of half every 80 days.
No one want to talk about Strontium. I was curious as to the biological half life. So I found the best study on humans, from a real contamination in Russia at the Techa river. The source is cited within the spreadsheet.
Or view the source information here
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/41/1/048/pdf/1742-6596_41_1_048.pdf
The answer Strontium bio half life is 333 years. I see, wrap your head around that one.
Click the large link below
Excel Biological Half Life of Strontium
Here it is in an Embedded form
TERMS OF USE
Feel free to use these spreadsheets, they are authorized for public use and modification for any anti-nuclear purpose, and only that. It is required that a complete hyperlink to Nukepro shall be included in any use of the spreadsheets.
One of the lies the nukers use is the half life, or the biological half life. Such as cesium leaves the body at the rate of half every 80 days.
No one want to talk about Strontium. I was curious as to the biological half life. So I found the best study on humans, from a real contamination in Russia at the Techa river. The source is cited within the spreadsheet.
Or view the source information here
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/41/1/048/pdf/1742-6596_41_1_048.pdf
The answer Strontium bio half life is 333 years. I see, wrap your head around that one.
Click the large link below
Excel Biological Half Life of Strontium
Here it is in an Embedded form
Dana Durnford
Dana Durnford Has been known to rant Has built a boat and is performing survey of the Canadian coastline. And not finding much. And catching others in government in blad faced lies about "there never were sea anomones in these water", and then he quickly finds that same researcher in a 5 year old video showing people the anomones in the waters.
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Strontium Solubility in Water, Can it be Yet Another Lie of Nuke
The nuketards say that strontium is not very soluble in water.
Well that's all relative.
There are 1.4 million grams of strontium in Fuku spent fuel inventory.
Do you think it might take Billions of liters of water to dissolve all that strontium?
Think again, in one of its very insoluble forms, Sr hydroxide, it would only take 342,000 liters of
water to dissolve all of it and transport it into the ocean.
That's approximately a large swimming pool
Good thing they built that plant on an river and knocked the mountain down.
What could possibly go wrong?
Here is screen captures showing the asinine build out of Fukushima, all because GE refused to customize their Mark 1 design with high head pumps.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/10/making-of-fukushima-archives-coriums-in.html
SR Hydroxide
342289 liters needed to dissolve all
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here is a great site that lists lots of Fukushima related cams and blogs
http://www.rockythedog.net/F/fuked.html
Well that's all relative.
There are 1.4 million grams of strontium in Fuku spent fuel inventory.
Do you think it might take Billions of liters of water to dissolve all that strontium?
Think again, in one of its very insoluble forms, Sr hydroxide, it would only take 342,000 liters of
water to dissolve all of it and transport it into the ocean.
That's approximately a large swimming pool
Good thing they built that plant on an river and knocked the mountain down.
What could possibly go wrong?
Here is screen captures showing the asinine build out of Fukushima, all because GE refused to customize their Mark 1 design with high head pumps.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/10/making-of-fukushima-archives-coriums-in.html
SR Hydroxide
342289 liters needed to dissolve all
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here is a great site that lists lots of Fukushima related cams and blogs
http://www.rockythedog.net/F/fuked.html
AS= Anti-Solar = Asshats
Every kWH of PV Solar Electric we create is Wealth Created
Every kWH of Electric from oils or coal is Wealth Depleted
Every kWH of Electric from nuclear is Wealth Stolen from the Future
stock TM 2014
======================================================================
One of the lies of the nuke cartel is simply using information that used to be accurate. Anytime you see anyone quote anything about solar and it is more than 2 years old, well, that information is likely to be completely bunk.
They also like to lie about the percent of supply that nuclear contributes, even if its a simple lie of torturing the statistics. This site pretends that nuclear is 47% of Spains Electricity, and they peg Solar at 3%. Even if accepting that is true, they state it is 2011 data.
http://thisweekinnuclear.com/?p=1524
And they like to lie about "being antinuke is being pro coal". The reality in Germany is that while solar and reneweable energies made huge strides, coal (both brown and hard) took a nose dive, even as nuclear continued to fall
And they like to lie about "renewable is expensive and homeowners are getting hit with big cost increases". The article below, translated from German shows how costs are going down
http://www.iwr.de/news.php?id=27357
In reality, Spain is shutting down it's nuclear fleet. The plant at Santa María de Garoña, was a single low output 366mW Boiling Water Reactor Mark 1 no less. Good riddance!
Spain only had 6 plants, now it has 5, good work, keep going.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Mar%C3%ADa_de_Garo%C3%B1a_Nuclear_Power_Plant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And for numb-nuts of the month award goes to Japan, for allowing asshat utilities to cripple the fledgling Solar PV industry.
http://www.renewablesinternational.net/gridlock-for-pv-in-kyushu-japan/150/452/82750/
Every kWH of Electric from oils or coal is Wealth Depleted
Every kWH of Electric from nuclear is Wealth Stolen from the Future
stock TM 2014
======================================================================
One of the lies of the nuke cartel is simply using information that used to be accurate. Anytime you see anyone quote anything about solar and it is more than 2 years old, well, that information is likely to be completely bunk.
They also like to lie about the percent of supply that nuclear contributes, even if its a simple lie of torturing the statistics. This site pretends that nuclear is 47% of Spains Electricity, and they peg Solar at 3%. Even if accepting that is true, they state it is 2011 data.
http://thisweekinnuclear.com/?p=1524
And they like to lie about "being antinuke is being pro coal". The reality in Germany is that while solar and reneweable energies made huge strides, coal (both brown and hard) took a nose dive, even as nuclear continued to fall
And they like to lie about "renewable is expensive and homeowners are getting hit with big cost increases". The article below, translated from German shows how costs are going down
http://www.iwr.de/news.php?id=27357
In reality, Spain is shutting down it's nuclear fleet. The plant at Santa María de Garoña, was a single low output 366mW Boiling Water Reactor Mark 1 no less. Good riddance!
Spain only had 6 plants, now it has 5, good work, keep going.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Mar%C3%ADa_de_Garo%C3%B1a_Nuclear_Power_Plant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And for numb-nuts of the month award goes to Japan, for allowing asshat utilities to cripple the fledgling Solar PV industry.
http://www.renewablesinternational.net/gridlock-for-pv-in-kyushu-japan/150/452/82750/
Nuclear News Sites, ENENEWS, Nucnews
=============================================================
Although it can be disturbing, it is also useful to review the "pro nuclear" news sites. You can easily see the spin and slantedness, as well as get real news. Here is one site you may want to put on your bookmarks.
This article is hilarious, Sellafield working 24/7 to make sure the open air pools are "safe". This shite has been kicking around, abandoned for over 50 years. The fuel is damaged and they are using underwater robots to handle broken abused neglected rods.
http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2014/11/06/sellafield-working-non-stop-to-make-sure-ponds-are-safe-and-secure
Cask the TRASH!
Here is a nice Anti Nuke site
http://nuclear-news.net/information/secrets-and-lies/
And this is a "neutral" site, nuclear news, nuclear power and nuclear warfare
I get a lot of my posting ideas generated from here
http://nucnews.com/whatsnew.php
And if really have a strong stomach, check out the ridiculously Pro nuke, infamous Rod Adams who does visit Nukepro by the way. Sorry Rod, you are woefully misguided.
http://atomicinsights.com/world-nuclear-association-discussion-radiation-protection/
Oh wait, lets not forget, the mother of all nuclear news aggregators, ENENEWS
http://enenews.com/
Although it can be disturbing, it is also useful to review the "pro nuclear" news sites. You can easily see the spin and slantedness, as well as get real news. Here is one site you may want to put on your bookmarks.
This article is hilarious, Sellafield working 24/7 to make sure the open air pools are "safe". This shite has been kicking around, abandoned for over 50 years. The fuel is damaged and they are using underwater robots to handle broken abused neglected rods.
http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2014/11/06/sellafield-working-non-stop-to-make-sure-ponds-are-safe-and-secure
Cask the TRASH!
Here is a nice Anti Nuke site
http://nuclear-news.net/information/secrets-and-lies/
And this is a "neutral" site, nuclear news, nuclear power and nuclear warfare
I get a lot of my posting ideas generated from here
http://nucnews.com/whatsnew.php
And if really have a strong stomach, check out the ridiculously Pro nuke, infamous Rod Adams who does visit Nukepro by the way. Sorry Rod, you are woefully misguided.
http://atomicinsights.com/world-nuclear-association-discussion-radiation-protection/
Oh wait, lets not forget, the mother of all nuclear news aggregators, ENENEWS
http://enenews.com/
Per the NRC Guidelines, How to Calculate Heat Output From a Spent Nuclear Fuel
First it matters whether the fuel came from a Boiling Water Reactor (like Fukushima was, and like dozens of operating reactors in the USA are) or from a Pressurized Water Reactor.
Second, it matters the degree of fuel "burn up". The more burn up the fuel gets, the more radiation and nasty elements it will have. It will also produce more heat after it is done fissioning. So it will require greater time to dry cask, and greater care in making sure the cooling systems are sized correctly and have adequate backup.
And finally, in the case of Fukushima, the rates of heat production are GREATLY determined by whether there is ongoing fission. We strongly believe that there has been ongoing fission in the underground Coria. There are repeated example of local radiation levels going up after the Coria are jostled by earthquakes. Then 3 to 7 days later, elevated readings in the USA are noted.
Here if the NRC guidance:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/fuels-materials/rg/03-054/
And here is a sample table
I am getting ready for 1.5 months of solid solar design and build out, so no time to play geek with the numbers. If anyone has time, crank up a spreadsheet an email it to me. I will post it up on the site here. Take the meltout estimated KG and apply wattage.
1 Watt = 3.412 BTU/Hour
1 Watt running for 1 hour = 3.412 BTU
1 BTU is the energy needed to heat 1 pound of water one degree Fahrenheit
Any geeks out there?
I will also be reporting in the next several weeks with airline Geiger videos and testing of Pacific Ocean Waters and air samples.
Second, it matters the degree of fuel "burn up". The more burn up the fuel gets, the more radiation and nasty elements it will have. It will also produce more heat after it is done fissioning. So it will require greater time to dry cask, and greater care in making sure the cooling systems are sized correctly and have adequate backup.
And finally, in the case of Fukushima, the rates of heat production are GREATLY determined by whether there is ongoing fission. We strongly believe that there has been ongoing fission in the underground Coria. There are repeated example of local radiation levels going up after the Coria are jostled by earthquakes. Then 3 to 7 days later, elevated readings in the USA are noted.
Here if the NRC guidance:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/fuels-materials/rg/03-054/
And here is a sample table
I am getting ready for 1.5 months of solid solar design and build out, so no time to play geek with the numbers. If anyone has time, crank up a spreadsheet an email it to me. I will post it up on the site here. Take the meltout estimated KG and apply wattage.
1 Watt = 3.412 BTU/Hour
1 Watt running for 1 hour = 3.412 BTU
1 BTU is the energy needed to heat 1 pound of water one degree Fahrenheit
Any geeks out there?
I will also be reporting in the next several weeks with airline Geiger videos and testing of Pacific Ocean Waters and air samples.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







