Booze Kills Nuke

Nuker are short sighted, greedy, they want immediate gratification, they don't care about short term risks to others or long term risks to anyone.



http://enformable.com/2012/10/supervisor-at-calvert-cliffs-confirmed-positive-for-alcohol-during-fitness-for-duty-test/

And they get drunk on duty.    Drunk while operating the most dangerous thing on earth.  

And these drunks just arent the worker bees, these are the supervisors.

Nuke is too dangerous for humans.  

At Kewaunee workers were busted for drinking at lunch IN CONTAINMENT!   Now Kewaunee is being shut down, 1 down 103 to go.

George Washingtons blog - Nuke Source for Nuke Pro

I normally like to come up with original material, but this list was just too perfect
Stolen from ZeroHedge who stole it from George Washington.


 http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-10-26/more-dozen-nuclear-plants-near-hurricane-sandy%E2%80%99s-path-brace-impactcc

The following lists the nuclear reactors and utilities in Sandy’s potential path.

While we don’t foresee any problems, the risk of nuclear accident in the U.S. is actually much greater than it was in Japan before Fukushima.
For example, fuel pools in the United States store an average of ten times more radioactive fuel than stored at Fukushima, and have virtually no safety features.
Let’s review the list and look at examples of problems experienced by the nuclear plants in Hurricane Sandy’s path:

• Brunswick experienced a reactor coolant system leak last year

• Surry has recently been plagued by problems with the coolant system, valves and damage from a tornado

• North Anna leaked tritium last year after an earthquake shook the plant and shifted around a gigantic radioactive storage cask

• Calvert Cliffs was knocked offline by the last hurricane

• Salem has been riddled with problems with security, turbines problems and  other issues.

• Hope Creek has suffered security problems, has the same design as the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1, has “some of the same issues with above-ground storage of spent fuel rods as Fukushima” and “was designed to withstand certain major weather events but we need to look at the potential impacts of more extreme events, especially … sea level rise and flooding”

• Peach Bottom purportedly has a defective design and has been plagued by various problems

• Limerick has suffered electrical and other issues

• Three Mile Island  suffered another leak in the cooling system last month

• Susquehanna has been hit with one problem after another

• Oyster Creek has been plagued with electrical and other problems

• Indian Point is widely recognized as one of the nation’s worst nuclear plants.  If Indian Point melted down, it could close New York City for years, and cost half a trillion dollars or more

• Millstone’s vulnerability is shown by the fact that it was shut down due to warm seawater

• Pilgrim has numerous structural problems.  And see this.  Pilgrim’s spent fuel pools contain more radioactive cesium than released by Fukushima, Chernobyl and all nuclear bomb tests combined

• Seabrook has had problems with corrosion, computers and a host of other issues

• Vermont Yankee – which has around 10 times more spent fuel rods than any of the individual Fukushima reactors – leaked tritium

It’s not surprising that there have been problems at all of these nuclear plants. After all, the U.S. has 23 reactors which are virtually identical to Fukushima. The archaic uranium reactor designs developed more than 40 years ago are only good for making bombs.
Most American nuclear reactors are old. They are aging poorly, and are in very real danger of melting down. And yet the NRC is relaxing safety standards at the old plants. And see this.
Indeed, while many of the plants are already past the service life that the engineers built them for, the NRC is considering extending licenses another 80 years, which former chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority and now senior adviser with Friends of the Earth’s nuclear campaign David Freeman calls “committing suicide”.

Nuke Jousting scores a kill, LOL

This is Hilarious…on Saturday the 20th, a pronuker was attacking me and posted links to a Wisconsin nuclear site. The link he provided gave me some troll jousting fodder, and I took a shot a Kewaunee, a troubled Wisconsin nuclear plant….

2 days later….they announce the closing of the plant.

No joke, check this article on ENENews, the Kewaunee nuke plant is being mothballed for economic reasons -- as its former large buyers have developed a successful feed-in-tariff using solar PV, and of course, Nat Gas backup and generation.

 http://enenews.com/first-nuclear-plant-shut-down-permanently-economic-reasons-possible-domino-effect-discussed-video/comment-page-1#comment-297685

Those cheeseheads ain't dumb, they are running from nuke before it kills the great lakes.

Link below is my original body shot at the Kewaunee

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/10/troll-jousting.html

Would they tell?

Would they tell?

If the Earth was going to fly through a "cloud" of meteors, would "they" tell you?

Supposedly, something as small as 400ft across could have earth devastating effects.   What if we were going to fly through a high density zone of meteors say 50 ft to 600ft in diameter?   And take maybe 200 serious hits?

Would they tell you?

Or would they make a power grab for all the resources in the world?
Would they build bunkers?
Would they beef up civilian law enforcement tools and vehicles?  

Your house would not likely be hit directly, but areas along shorelines could be wiped out by waves.     A great majority of important commerce occurs on waterways.   Economic and social chaos could be huge.
------------------------------------------------------------
They call it the Tunguska Event.

There was a big asteroid that "blew up" over Russia in 1908, "they", you know the experts (!) couldn't find any remnant of the space rock.  Now they think Lake Cheko is actually the impact crater.

NASA says this rock was probably only 120 feet across.

 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/11/071107-russia-crater.html

They say the "blast" was equal to about 1000 Hiroshima Bombs, and it flattened 770 square miles of forest.

They says that a 10M (about 33 feet across) space rock can generate a blast equal to a small Nuke bomb like at Nagasaki.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What if 25% of the planet were about to be wiped out?  Would they tell us, would they tell the muppets?

Or would amateur astronomers pickup near earth trajectories just days ahead of time?   Perhaps the big scopes and space based scope already know much of this.   But no use exciting the sheeple, sheeple are harder to shear when they are running around all panicked.

June 2012 a recently discovered asteroid did a fly by, and it was discovered to be "earth crushing" size, more than twice the size the earlier estimates made.

http://www.universetoday.com/95924/recent-earth-passing-asteroid-is-much-bigger-than-originally-estimated/

Lots of fly by information out there.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57531234/house-size-asteroid-to-buzz-earth-today/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57453171/huge-asteroid-flies-by-earth-today-how-to-watch-online/

February 2013

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/trajectory-unclear-feb-2013-asteroid-will-be-within-thousands-of-miles-of-earth-impact-would-be-as-big-as-siberian-tunguska-event-1000-times-more-powerful-than-hiroshima_03042012

2014 (aka 2003 QQ47)

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/09/02/asteroid.reut/index.html

The Near Earth Asteroid Tracking Team SpaceWatch The Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazard Group Facts about asteroids SEDS Asteroid Page Asteroid Page Asteroid Fact Sheet What are asteroids?

Troll Jousting

Hilarious!

Pro-nuke Mikey on Fluffpost had this comeback to my anti nuke rant...and the links he gave worked 100% against his case

Mike-----------------
Please, I invite everyone to go to each site and learn for themselves. I believe most people are intelligent enough to determine the validity of each...   There are many educational websites to learn more and dispel the fear and uncertainty propaganda which you promote.http://nuclearinfo.net/
http://www.whatisnuclear.com/
http://www.energy.wisc.edu/research-centers/wisc-institute-of-nuclear-systems/
http://www.world-nuclear.org/education/intro.htm
------------------------------------
stock say

Wisco nuke --- their main buyer from the klunker Kewaunee plant in which nuke employees were busted for pounding beers at lunchhour INSIDE containment, is cutting all buying from Kewaunee in favor of strong feed in tariff from Solar Power, and natgas generators....and on their website, their next 3 events are
Frequency metrics for renewables....bioenergy....fracking....

Hilarious! yep those cheeseheads are smart enough to run away from nuclear at all due speed.

Good job for pointing this out Mikey.

How to Take Good Samples of Radiation

This one done by an engineer experienced in radiation measurement.   Hosted by Arnie Gunderson.

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/50406479?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=6B1B06" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

Solar Calculations are Really Easy

A pronuker was claiming that a family of 4 needs 120 PV solar panels to make their own electricity.    Turns out he was lying by a factor of 400%---trying to make it seem like energy independence was impossible to obtain when in fact it is simple and easy to obtain.
______________________________________________________________

Here is his comment

artleads

04:55 PM on 10/15/2012

What's wrong with placing a moratorium on all BIG energy proposals, while we see how to maximize solar-on-every-roof and conservation?

ThinkCreeps
 Because it'll be very dark. That's an excellent step, but not sufficient.

40kWh per day per head is the average US electricity consumption. Does your family of four have a 200-square-meter roof?


Here is my response.  If you follow the calcs, you will see just how easy they are.
_____________________________________________________________
I see 2152 SF, and about 18 SF per 255W panel, that means 120 panels.    Now using a DC to AC multiplier of .824 the AC output of the panel will be around 210W *120 panels, or around 25.214 kW.   Wow!   that is a huge system creeps!

Now at 5 Sunhours *25.1 kW that equals around  126 kWH per day.   that would be 30 day * 126 kWH or around 3782 kWH per month.    

hmmm--at the national average of $.12 that would mean the monthly bill would be around $453 a month in electricity, although the average family of 4 only pays $120.

And indeed, in Hawaii, sunhours around 6, the average family takes their bill to zero with about 20 to 30 panels NOT 120 panels as you "promote"

So stop lying, how can you tell when a nuker is lying?  When his keyboard is typing.

Go solar, so cheap, there has been a seachange.

______________________________________________________________________

Nuke and Cancer a Word Correlation

Funny this relationship, well, not funny at all actually.

Killing ourselves to live, willing to give it all up for the illusion of cheap power.   Sad.

San Onofre the Real Story

From "jollygoodtimer"

Try to read between the lines of SCEdison's proposal for the partial test restart at San Onofre.

Can you you see that SCE is ---wink, wink--- is trying to get you to see they are --wink, winking--at you?

SCE knows that San Onofre is toast. But they can't say that. We must say that San Onofre is simply undergoing repair necessary for gradual restart.

We must agree to pretend, for the present time, that San Onofre is less than half-way through its operable power generating life span.

Because once we say that San Onofre's days are done generating electricity, the FASB (financial accounting standards board) rules will require that costs for decommissioning the facility must be recognized on all of SCE's financial reports.

That will cause the financial ratios used by SCE's stock and bond investors, and used to calculate executive bonuses, to change from mildly sweet to excessively bitter.

The costs for decommissioning the San Onofre facility need to remain as addendum items on SCE's books - still far out into the future when technological advances are expected to make the estimated nominal costs of decommission significantly less than today.

That's the little game - wink, wink - we all need to play along.

Until SCE can legally decouple the liability of decommission expense from their asset and equity equation - lets just agree to say that full power operation is just around the next corner.
--------------------------------------------------------------

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

CaptD

Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...

1409 Fans

Become a fan

 

10:30 AM on 10/11/2012

Major points against SanO remaining in operation:
1. It is sited on Major Fault lines + the new NRC Director is a trained Geologist that knows faults.

2. SCE sneaked the RSG phony design past the NRC review process!

3. SCE/SanO has the worst operated reactor in the Country.

4. SCE has a long history of major Safety violations that is the worst in the USA.

5. SanO almost had a major nuclear accident because of SCE's "in-house" bad tube design.

6. Decommissioning SanO would instantly solve all the NRC SanO oversight issues.

7. The NRC knows that if they stop SanO from restarting, the Industry will get the message, to tighten up their operations.

8. It will make the NRC look great without making them look like they caved into the activists.

9. Restarting even under 70% power has MAJOR RISKS, as the DAB Safety Team has already pointed out, so why take ANY chances?

As I see it, the NRC would much rather have all its SanO problems get Decommissioned and we can help by telling them N☢ SCE RESTARTS

Email to the Prime Minister of Japan

Its easy, use this link


https://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/forms/comment_ssl.html

Thank you for your comment.

Your comment is sent for
the Official Residence of the Prime Minister.

Home