Monday, November 18, 2013

Lying is not good for ACA credibility

From a comment on Huffpost

 

Democrats insist the president didn't lie:

“If somebody has insurance they like, they should be able to keep that insurance. If they have a doctor that they like, they should be able to keep their doctor.” Barack Obama, YouTube, March 6, 2009

“The plans you are discussing embody my core belief that Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it, …” Barack Obama, Letter to Senate Democrat Leaders, June 2, 2009

“Americans must have the freedom to keep whatever doctor and health care plan they have…” Barack Obama, Remarks on Health Care, Washington, D.C., June 11, 2009

"From this day forward, all of the cynics, all the naysayers — they're going to have to confront the reality of what this reform is and what it isn't. They'll have to finally acknowledge this isn't a government takeover of our health care system. They'll see that if Americans like their doctor, they'll be keeping their doctor. You like your plan? You'll be keeping your plan. No one is taking that away from you." President Obama, March 25, 2010

"First, if you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance — this law will only make it more secure and more affordable." President Obama, June 28, 2012

Friday, November 15, 2013

ACA Obamacare Fiasco, real data from the real website

I tried the website, and it technically functioned OK at 1AM.

Some issues:

1) Massive invasion of privacy even before you can get a somewhat customized budget estimate.

2) You sign away all your rights and privacy for yourself and your family, and actually authorize the Department of Homeland Security to investigate yourself and your family. And this is BEFORE you can get an actual quote.

3) One area of the website stated that with a $34,000 income that "my policy" would get over 50% of the annual fee refunded as a tax credit. And then further on in the budget quoting process, that tax credit was reduced to $285, or less 3% of the annual insurance cost for 2 people.

4) They have a "chat" function, but the federal worker responding takes FOREVER to respond, like they are looking in books on the other side. AND you have to agree to yet ANOTHER onerous giving away of your rights just to talk to them via chat. WAY too many lawyers worked on this site.

5) There is NO WAY to compare the 60 or so health choices presented for my County of my State. You have no idea the deductible, the copays, the items covered and percentages, and you can't find that anywhere on the website. Sheesh, average buying sites for commercial products let you do side by side table comparisons of various products that you checklist. This facilitates an informed decision making process, where you can eliminate the chaff quickly so you can focus your due diligence on items that really matter.

Please review the following screen captures, some are annotated by me




Highly personal information, the same information types that could be used to allow a bad person to access your financial accounts and move money.    They can't even run a website, do you think they can protect your data?




Thursday, November 14, 2013

Proof from Argonne National Lab and the US EPA that Fukushima 3 could and did blow up in a nuclear type explosion

This is important, I found this video after it had been "disappeared". It shows video of testing by Argonne National Lab that a standard nuclear reactor can blow sky high in a type of nuclear explosion. 14 minutes into the video is the biggest bang This proves that Fuku 3 can and did blow up in a nuclear explosion, and that is the only way the force could be created to get underneath the nuclear fuels to launch them and aerosolized them into the atmosphere.

Which is proven in the second link from EPA data that I data mined.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/videos-moderated-prompt-criticality.html


http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/uranium-aerosolized-into-atmosphere.html

Monday, November 11, 2013

CPM of Gamma in energy range 600-800keV


Thank you for contacting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We
appreciate your concern. It’s important to know that the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission has said we do not expect to see radiation at
harmful levels reaching the U.S. from damaged Japanese nuclear power
plants.

The Environmental Protection Agency maintains a nationwide radiation
monitoring system known as RadNet. This system continuously monitors the
nation's air and regularly monitors drinking water, milk and
precipitation for environmental radiation. As of 3:00pm (EDT) April 19,
2011, EPA's RadNet radiation air monitors across the U.S. show typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern.
Data from each fixed RadNet monitor are transmitted to EPA’s National
Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory hourly. These data include
the gamma radiation measured during that hour. The data are screened
against pre-set values for each monitor to identify unusual readings,
particularly elevated radiation levels. In order to increase sensitivity
for screening the spectrum for small increases in gamma radiation, EPA
divides the gamma radiation measurement data into nine different gamma
energy ranges that collectively cover the energy spectrum where
essentially all of the nuclides of concern will be detected by our
monitors.
When the RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is
outside the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor,
those data are flagged to be reviewed by a trained EPA scientist. The
review includes obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and
evaluating that spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.
EPA scientists use a science called gamma spectrometry to evaluate the
complete spectrum of the monitor’s specific calibration to detect the
type and amount of gamma emitting radioactive material at that location.
In this way, EPA scientists are able to determine what specific isotopes
are present in the air at any given time.
For information on the energy ranges for the gamma charts:
The following table shows the energy ranges that correspond with the
gamma charts on our website. Radioactive material from Japan could be
seen in various energy ranges, depending on the specific radionuclide.
Iodine-131 and cesium-137 would primarily be seen in ranges 3 and 5,
respectively, along with other naturally occurring radioactive
materials.
Please note that fluctuations in the gamma readings may be caused by a
number of factors, primarily naturally occurring radioactivity in the
environment. Two of the most prominent naturally-occurring radionuclides
in air are lead-214 and bismuth-214. Natural levels of these nuclides
fluctuate significantly in the environment and their primary gamma
energies are similar to those of cesium-137 and iodine-131. When the
RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is outside
the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor, those
data are flagged to be reviewed by an EPA scientist. The review includes
obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and evaluating that
spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.
Energy Ranges
Energy | Gamma Energies
Range | (keV)
Number |
---------+---------------------
1 | Reserved by
| software for
| instrument
| stabilization
---------+---------------------
2 | 100-200
---------+---------------------
3 | 200-400
---------+---------------------
4 | 400-600
---------+---------------------
5 | 600-800
---------+---------------------
6 | 800-1000
---------+---------------------
7 | 1000-1400
---------+---------------------
8 | 1400-1800
---------+---------------------
9 | 1800-2200
---------+---------------------
10 | 2200-2800
As part of the federal government's continuing effort to make our
activities and science transparent and available to the public, the
Environmental Protection Agency will continue to keep all RadNet data
available in the current online database. Please see
www.epa.gov/japan2011 for more information.

-------------------------
additional information

Iodine-131 with a physical half-life of 8.05 days and an effective half-life in the whole body of 7.6 days possesses its greatest energy peak at 360 keV, a second-ranking peak at 280 keV, a third peak at 638 keV and a fourth peak at 724 keV (Arena, 1971). The lower couple fall into range 3 (200-400 keV) , whereas the higher couple fall into range 5 (600-800 keV) in the RadNet graph.


Gamma spectrum of cesium-137 (Arena, 1971). Counts/channel are plotted on a logarithmic scale versus energy [keV]. Peaks are labelled in MeV
By contrast, cesium-137 with a physical half-life of 30.17 years and an effective half-life in the whole body of 70 days emits gamma radiation at 662 keV, falling into range 5 of the RadNet graph. However, backscatter (Compton effect), that is low-energy detector counts produced by incomplete energy transfer between the ionizing radiation and the detector material, contributes a considerable fraction of the total count rate to range 3. Although the precise shape of the spectral curves shown above depends on the radioactivity of the sources and the instruments used for the measurement, the energy peaks remain invariable and representative. Therefore, the spectra may can be employed for the demonstration of principles.

Partial integration of the areas under the spectral curves taking the logarithmic scale of the counts/channel into account suggests that the iodine-131 decay contributes about 91 percent of the total count rate summed over both ranges to range 3, whereas cesium-137 decay will contribute about one third to this range. Therefore, if both isotopes are present in the sample, the count rate measured in range 3 does not exclusively reflect iodine-131 decay, and iodine-131 will also contribute to the count rate measured in range 5, though to a smaller degree than cesium-137. Despite this cross-contamination, a prominent increase in range 3 suggests the presence of iodine-131 and in range 5 that of cesium-137. Furthermore, the EPA provides offline post-hoc data for identified radioisotopes.

Regardless of its low spectral resolution, the real-time RadNet graph may potentially have its uses for the identification of a radiological incident. An increase above the average counts per minute (CPM) measured in ranges 3 and 5 beyond three standard errors of the mean can be considered statistically significant with 95 percent confidence. Mean count rates measured in the past can be queried in the RadNet database. Sequences of up to 400 measurements can be downloaded in a batch.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Proof of Nuclear Explosion at Fukushima

Folks, glad to see this is going mainstream on the Telegraph.    We engineers who have followed closely have been aware of all of this for years.

As an MSME, and using data mining of EPA air sampling data shortly after the explosions, it is undeniable that at least tens of tons of uranium and plutonium were aerosolized and ended up in reporting stations from Saipan to Guam to Honolulu to San Francisco.    Let me show you why this PROVEs beyond any doubt that the explosions were a minor nuclear explosion.   

They were using MOX fuel which is enriched in plutonium (the stuff bombs are made of).    Reactor 3 exploded the most, it was the MOX reactor building.   All the fuel is either in a deep vessel called the reactor vessel, or the spent fuel pool which is a huge pool with 80 foot tall walls.     If the explosion was hydrogen as "they" claim, then the explosion would have s tarted from the highest points as hydrogen is the LIGHTEST element and floats up.   Even if the hydrogen fills the reactor building, it still wouldn't have gotten underneath the fuel rods in the pool or the vessel in order to Launch a huge percentage of them into the air.    And by the EPA observed densities in air showing uranium and plutonium dispersed all over the Pacific, we know for a fact that at least ten of tons of nuclear material was launched, maybe even 100 tons.
So the explosions came from within the bottom of the fuel pool and/or explosion from bottom of reactor vessel where the melted rods had amassed.     

Also consider that in all the pictures and videos of TEPCO pumping water to cool reactor buildings, they were never trying to pump anything into reactor 3.     Very simple....there was nothing left to cool.     We breathed that stuff in.

So your powers that be are trying to sell you on the New Nuclear Renaissance, and even this week launching major Propaganda as a movie called Pandoras Promise.      Don't fall for it.  Protest, show up at meetings, write letters and emails.   Show disgust.

Here is the proof of the EPA air density data showing the extreme aerosolization of nuclear materials.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/uranium-aerosolized-into-atmosphere.html

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/plutonium-admission-by-epa.html



A video showing Unit 3 Explosion, note the massive chunk of concrete which goes to the top of the plume and then falls out to the left.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Waves of Radiation Passing Over USA

NETC has been showing some high radiation CPM, some getting into full Alert basis.

This is about 10 days after the Fukushima Typhoon.

Stay out of the rain, unless you have a Geiger and can prove it safe.

(IF you like this cutting edge reporting, sign up as a follower!)


Here is a chart I made to help quickly understand CPM and mSv radiation readings.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/geiger-counter-interpretation.html

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Hawaii Radiation Spiking 2 days after Fukushima Typhoon

This is an item of concern for those who still live in Hawaii.

2 days after a Typhoon hit Japan, and TEPCO admitted large radiation releases due to the storm, radiation levels spike in Hawaii.

Keep in mind, this will travel to mainland USA and cross over in a day to 4 days.

Another storm is headed to Fukushima for a 1 -2 punch.   This will extend the danger time frame.

Basic good radiation practice here:

1) Stay out of the rain
2) Dose up with anti-oxidants
3) Run your multiple HEPA filters all the time
4) Get a Geiger and learn how to use it



Here is my chart showing relative danger levels of radiation, 150 is pretty bad.    That is where Hawaii is now.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/geiger-counter-interpretation.html


Wednesday, October 23, 2013

ACA Health Care, aka Obamacare

I tried the website, and it technically functioned OK at 1AM.  

Some issues:
1) Massive invasion of privacy even before you can get a somewhat customized budget estimate.
2) You sign away all your rights and privacy for yourself and your family, and actually authorize the Department of Homeland Security to investigate yourself and your family.    And this is BEFORE you can get an actual quote.
3) One area of the website stated that with a $34,000 income that "my policy" would get over 50% of the annual fee refunded as a tax credit.      And then further on in the budget quoting process, that tax credit was reduced to $285, or less 3% of the annual insurance cost for 2 people.
4) They have a "chat" function, but the federal worker responding takes FOREVER to respond, like they are looking in books on the other side.   AND you have to agree to yet ANOTHER onerous giving away of your rights just to talk to them via chat.     WAY too many lawyers worked on this site.
5) There is NO WAY to compare the 60 or so health choices presented for my County of my State.   You have no idea the deductible, the copays, the items covered and percentages, and you can't find that anywhere on the website.     Sheesh, average buying sites for commercial products let you do side by side table comparisons of various products that you checklist.    This facilitates an informed decision making process, where you can eliminate the chaff quickly so you can focus your due diligence on items that really matter.   

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Nuclear = Clunker

Indian Point is a priority on the KILL LIST



And nice to see Huffpost getting in on the nuke bashing.  
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-witherspoon/former-nrc-chair-emergenc_b_4060780.html


However, the midwest was an early adopter of Nuclear, especially with Argonne labs in Chicago researching and promoting nuclear.

The down side is LOTS of GE Mark 1 (the worst, just like Fukushima) in the midwest. Here is the Midwest kill list with status of these Clunker plants (rearrange the letters in nuclear and see if you can spell Clunker, yep, its a natural)

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2013/05/kill-list-midwest.html

Now if we can just get someone to write a tune to Pink Floyd's classic

"We don't need no radiation...

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Bill of Rights Summary of Current Status

I have wanted for several months to compare the Bill of Rights to what is really going on in America

 I knew it was bad, but this makes it clear how bad. Here is the summary, and in the below links are the full texts of the amendments and the supporting information on how the amendments are being raped.

Summary of the Bill of Rights (Amendments 1 through 10)

Amendment 1, Freedom of Speech,Decimated
Amendment 2, Guns, In process of Being Decimated
Amendment 3, Soldiers in Houses, These are Soldiers "quartered" in private houses, which is not really applicable, however the Boston house invasions by military were surprisingly Orwellian.

Amendment 4, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Decimated, Stopped and Frisked, NSA Spying
Amendment 5, Without Due Process of Law, Decimated and Droned
Amendment 6, Criminal Prosecutions, Decimated
Amendment 7, Right to Jury Trial, Decimated
Amendment 8, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Decimated and Tortured
Amendment 9, You have all the rights that aren’t mentioned, Decimated -- You have NO RIGHTS and are lucky to have the Privileges that Big Brother temporarily grants to you.

Amendment 10, The States AND Individuals Hold all Power Except that Specifically Granted to Feds BY THE CONSTITUTION,Decimated

You can download this as a Word Document here

 https://www.box.com/s/m1m8znek6slezx37jmsm

You can view this as embedded, here: